Legal Opinion

State v. L.J.M.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1996No. 63367-3PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

— The principal question presented by this appeal is whether, in a case where it is undisputed that the site of an alleged crime was within the external *388geographic boundaries of an Indian reservation, and the defendant identifies himself at trial as a member of a recognized Indian tribe, the State’s burden of proof on the issue of jurisdiction is greater than it would otherwise be. In addition, we must determine, regardless of what level of burden the State must carry on that issue, whether that burden was satisfied.

In this case, the Okanogan County Superior Court concluded, as a matter of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. McCullumWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Matter of Dependency of AEPWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. SquallyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. SquallyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API