Osborne v. Elliott
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court of the district of San Francisco. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinions given in the case.
1Opinion of the Court
*338 By the Court,
Bennett, J.
The note on which this suit is brought, having been executed at the same time and concerning the same matter as the contract set up by the defendants, must be. taken as forming a part of it, and the whole must be construed together. Yiewed in this light, the defendants were required, by the terms of the contract, to pay the note; and the plaintiffs, on the payment of the note, to execute and give to the defendants a good and valid title to the ship. The promises were dependent promises, and the plaintiffs cannot maintain an action without showing performance or an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Topping v. RootNew York Supreme Court · 1826
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hill v. GrigsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Rourke v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869