Legal Opinion
Ketchikan Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Bishop
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1928No. 5199PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The son of the defendants in'error came to his death as the result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment while in the service of the plaintiff in error. For the loss of his support the defendants in error, as plaintiffs in the court bélow, recovered each a judgment against the plaintiff in error for the sum of $1,560, under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Alaska (Session Laws 1923, c. 98) which provides: “(5) Where such deceased employee was survived by his or her father and mother, both dependent upon him or her for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. BraudSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In re CarrollIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Blanton v. Wheeler & Howes Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Havey v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sunny Point Packing Co. v. FaighCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- In Re Famous Players Lasky CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1929