Legal Opinion

United States v. McClellan

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1960No. Crim. Nos. 15875, 15876PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

Pursuant to § 2255, 28 U.S.C.A., the defendant McClellan moved to vacate concurrent sentences of ten and five years, respectively, on his plea of guilty to two informations, each charging con*129cealment, sale and disposition of stolen property. 18 U.S.C. § 2315.1 The ten year sentence was subsequently reduced to five years. All the sentences specified that McClellan may become eligible for parole at such time as the Board of Parole may determine. 18 U.S.C. § 4208.

The defendant was arraigned with four co-defendants, Daniel Langston, Milton Rosenberg, Paul Rosenberg and Harry…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  2. United States v. ShneerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. KruchtenArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Duane A. Verdon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. United States v. LangstonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Piano v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API