Legal Opinion · Dissent

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. William Nami

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2016No. 14-0901Published

1DissentJustice Johnson

The Court concludes that under substantive federal law, which controls in this Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) action, the ferae naturae doctrine was not part of the comparative negligence balancing entrusted to the jury, but rather that it completely negated Union Pacific’s duty to use reasonable care to provide a safe workplace. I respectfully dissent, .

I. FELA and Ferae Naturae A. FELA. Congress enacted FELA in 1908 to address a perceived imbalance in the human costs borne by railroads and their employees. Consol. Rail Corp. v. Gottshall, 512 U.S. 532, 542, 114 S.Ct. 2896, 129…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API