Legal Opinion

Lackie v. Emmert

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 12, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Polh District Court. — Hubert Utterback, Judge. The ultimate question is whether error was committed in charging an executor with interest on funds in his hands belonging to legatees.

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

l. Executors and tor™1 managemont of estate: allowance of Interest against executor. I. The order that the executor pay interest was made in a proceeding in probate, and in ruling on exceptions to the. executor’s report. And appellant contends that the court was without jurisdiction to make an allowance of interest upon any application in probate, and, at all events, had , , , . _ , no power to make such allowance by means of decision upon exceptions to the report of an executor.

We are unable to see how Huey v. Huey, 26 Iowa 525, cited by appellant in support of this proposition, in any way…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dorris v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. In re the Estate of BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. In re the Estate of YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. In re Estate of GloydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. Huey v. HueySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of SheelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. In Re Estate of MowreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Irwin v. Keokuk Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. In Re Will of ProestlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API