Legal Opinion
United States v. Adamson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1947No. 11396PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONE, Circuit Judge.
In 1925 appellee, James H. Adamson, and his brother entered into a partnership at will for developing and dealing in yarns and textiles, appellee furnishing the capital, and the brother, Percy Adamson, the technical skill. By 1931 this partnership had succeeded in developing a new type of elastic yarn, known as Lastex, and had secured patent and trademark rights to it. The Adamson partnership then entered into two contracts for the sale, to the United States Rubber Co., of the use of these patent and trademark rights in consideration of the payment of certain royalties to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HopkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Helvering v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Stilgenbaur v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Rainier Brewing Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Grace Bros. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Dwight A. Ward v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Hanna P. Ward v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Lazier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Harold Wener v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Molly Wener v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Herbert v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.