Legal Opinion

Curtin v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 2, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners-respondents Ann Curtin and Joan Gunzberg were designated as candidates for the party office of alternate delegate on a slate committed to the candidacy of Senator Birch Bayh. After Senator Bayh withdrew his candidacy, petitioners decided to support Congressman Morris Udall. Following the March legislative amendments to section 21 of the Election Law (which not only permitted candidates to declare a preference for a presidential candidate and have this preference stated on the ballot, but also extended the time for candidates…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Proud v. RelinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Angletti v. MorrealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. ANGLETTI, FRANCIS J. v. MORREALE, MARCUSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Angletti v. MorrealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Angletti v. MorrealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API