Legal Opinion

White v. Robinson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Oceana. (V. H. Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiffs sued defendant, who had sold them several school orders, on the ground that a portion of them had been issued without authority. The declaration sets up an undertaking by defendant that they were good, true and valid orders signed by the school officers.

On the trial it appeared that plaintiffs bought the orders at a discount and that they were signed by the parties who purported to sign them. It also appeared that they were purchased without indorsement, being payable to bearer, and that defendant made no representations and was asked no questions on the character or consideration.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Otis v. Cullum, ReceiverSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. DrewIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bank of Commerce v. RuffinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API