Legal Opinion

Federal Election Commission v. Adams

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 6, 2008No. Case CV 07-4419 DSF (SHx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ALLEGED BY DEFENDANT

DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.

On July 6, 2007, Plaintiff Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) brought a Complaint claiming that Defendant Stephen Adams violated two provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended and codified at 2 U.S.C. sections 431 through 455 (“Act”). The FEC alleged that during the two months prior to the November 2004 presidential election,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Giles v. Canus CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  2. Justin Bradshaw and Gustavo Lopez, individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability companyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API