Legal Opinion

Upjohn Co. v. Marshall

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided November 24, 1992No. 05-92-02380-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Justice.

The Upjohn Company seeks writ of mandamus compelling respondent, the Honorable John McClellan Marshall, Judge presid ing of the 14th District Court of Dallas County, Texas, to vacate an order permitting public access to certain documents offered into evidence during an ongoing trial. We conditionally grant the writ.

William R. Freeman and his family sued Upjohn on a products liability theory, because Freeman had taken Halcion, a drug that Upjohn manufactured. Upjohn moved to seal certain documents about Halcion’s manufacture. Upjohn posted the public notices required by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Dallas Morning News v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Upjohn Co. v. Freeman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. Houston North Properties v. White, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  5. Taft v. SchraubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Richardson, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  2. In Re Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  3. In Re Assurances Generales Banque Nationale, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  4. in Re Mary Richardson, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  5. in Re Mary Richardson, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API