Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Boysen

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1935No. Civ. No. 1185PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The respondent has moved to dis- . miss this appeal on the ground that no proceeding for the preparation of a bill of exceptions or of a transcript is pending in the trial court, that the time to institute any such proceeding has expired, that no request for the preparation of a clerk’s transcript has been filed, and that the time within which the preparation of a clerk’s transcript might be requested has expired.

Notice of this motion was filed in this court on February 8, 1935, the motion being noticed for March 12, 1935. On February 21, 1935, a clerk’s transcript on appeal was filed here.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steiner v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Steiner v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API