Legal Opinion

Robinson v. McIntosh

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided October 15, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The complaint in this action was filed by the plaintiffs, as trustees under a general assignment, executed by an insolvent firm for the benefit of creditors; and alleged*, in substance, that the defendant, as a special partner, formed, with three other persons, a limited partnership, under the firm name of McIntosh & Henderson, pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Statutes of this state; that all the partners signed and acknowledged the usual certificate, wherein it was…

Read the full summary

The complaint in this action was filed by the plaintiffs, as trustees under a general assignment, executed by an insolvent firm for the benefit of creditors; and alleged*, in substance, that the defendant, as a special partner, formed, with three other persons, a limited partnership, under the firm name of McIntosh & Henderson, pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Statutes of this state; that all the partners signed and acknowledged the usual certificate, wherein it was stated that the special partner had contributed twenty thousand dollars as capital; that one of the general partners…

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court. Woodruff, J.

The demurrer admits that the defendant united with Thomas and' James McIntosh and George Henderson in a certificate, stating that the parties had formed a limited partnership under the name or firm of “ McIntosh & Henderson,” in which the other parties were general partners and the defendant was special partner, and as such had contributed $20,000 to the common stock.

That such certificate was duly acknowledged and filed, accompanied by the affidavit of Thomas McIntosh that the defendant had paid in the said sum of $20,000 in cash; that the business contemplated was begun and continued about…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Innes v. LansingNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  2. Parker v. BrowningNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
  3. Townsend and Others v. GoeweyNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  4. Havens & Dorr v. HusseyNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  5. Westerlo v. EvertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1828

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  2. Pritchett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API