State v. Humann

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Daniel Humann appeals a district court order requiring sexual offender registration, arguing the district court’s findings were insufficient. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On June 27, 2008, Humann was charged with “possession of certain materials prohibited” by N.D.C.C. § 12.1-27.2-04.1, for possessing on his cell phone images depicting sexual conduct by a minor. On February 3, 2009, Humann pled guilty. He was sentenced to five years incarceration with all but one year suspended for five years following his release. After serving his time at the penitentiary, Hu-mann was released…