State v. Ulmer
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
The four above-styled cases have been consolidated on appeal. The facts and the decisive question in each are the same. We shall write this opinion as though there was one case involving one defend-, ant.
On January 10, 1960, an indictment was returned charging defendant with setting up and keeping a gambling table for the purpose of operating a dice game. On April 22, 1960, the trial court sustained defendant’s motion to quash that indictment and ordered defendant’s discharge. On June 20, 1960, an information was filed denominated in the record as “in lieu of indictment”…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- State v. BollingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- State v. CraigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State v. ClipperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- State v. PottingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. MichelCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
- State v. PerouSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State v. Little River Drainage DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.