Heideman v. American Family Insurance Group
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
A jury found that by extreme and outrageous conduct, American Family Insurance Group intentionally caused James Heideman, a former American Family agent, extreme and disabling emotional dis tress. It awarded Heideman $150,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages. On motions after verdict, the trial court changed two of the special verdict answers and dismissed the complaint. The trial court also commented that if the jury's answers were sustained on appeal, a new trial should be held because the answers were against the great weight of the evidence. The trial court then…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alsteen v. GehlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Mueller v. BrunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Fehring v. Republic InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Oostburg State Bank v. United Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hicks v. NunneryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Wausau Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1992
- Frisch v. St. Croix Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Market Tavern, Inc. v. BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- MacHerey v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.