Legal Opinion

Doe v. Doe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2010No. 36572PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order modifying the custody provisions in a divorce decree on the ground that Mother was engaging in a pattern of dysfunctional behavior showing that she was completely irrational with regard to sharing custody of their child with Father and that Mother’s behavior was negatively impacting the child’s relationship with Father. We affirm the order of the magistrate court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

John Doe I (Father) and Jane Doe I (Mother) were married on August 30, 2003, but they separated about four months later. They have a son who was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gustaves v. GustavesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. King v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Levin v. LevinIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Brownson v. AllenIdaho Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jane Doe I v. John Doe II John Doe II and Jane Doe II v. Jane Doe I and John Doe IIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Re: Guardianship: Bond v. RoundIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Stephens v. BuellIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Franklin v. FranklinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. LOWER PAYETTE DITCH CO. v. HarveyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API