Applin v. State

Shulman, Chief Judge.

Based on the theory of unexplained possession of recently stolen property, appellants were convicted of the burglary of a sporting goods store.

1. Appellants’ contention that there was not sufficient evidence to identify as fruits of the burglary the property recovered by police officers in searches of appellants’ homes is meritless. The owners of the stolen merchandise were very positive in their testimony identifying the goods and giving the bases for the recognition of the merchandise. Their testimony was sufficient. *893Herrington v. State, 149 Ga. App. 130 (253 SE2d 810).

2…