Legal Opinion

Hobart v. Cavanaugh

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 29, 1967PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.

This action of tort for assault and battery is before us on the plaintiff’s exception to the allowance of the defendant’s motion that a verdict be entered for him under leave reserved. G. L. c. 231, § 120.

The defendant (Cavanaugh) conducted a trucking business. For several years he kept his trucks at a garage operated by the plaintiff (Hobart) in Beading. Cavanaugh employed one Blickenstaff as a truck driver. Blicken-staff’s normal duties required him to truck tannery products from Peabody or Lynn to Woburn. He worked on a part time basis, from three to eight hours a day. Blicken-staff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levi v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Zerngis v. H. P. Hood & SonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Rego v. Thomas Brothers Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Collins v. WiseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. JerezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. McIntyre v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  4. Nichols v. Land Transport Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1999
  5. Estate of Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API