Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ashe v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 8, 1983No. Nos. 81-1629, 82-1434, 82-1435 and 82-1436Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBecker, Circuit Judge

The four cases before us each raise a different question. Those questions presented in Dobslaw and Burkholder are relatively easy to answer; for the reasons stated in the margin, I join in the majority’s disposition of those two cases.1 Although I *870disagree with the majority’s conclusion in Ashe, I do not find Ashe to be a particularly difficult case, and I explain in Part IIB, infra, my reasons for dissenting from the majority’s judgment. The most difficult— and most important — case before us is Bosworth. While I concur in the result reached by the majority in that case, I believe that the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API