Legal Opinion

Coulston v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Gokter, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

The appellants are the owners of property situated on Pennsylvania Avenue, Baltimore City, and embraced in the territory annexed to the City of Baltimore by the Act of 1888, Chapter 98. It was taxed at the full city rate for the year 1907, and the City Collector presented bills to the appellants demanding payment of the taxes, and notified them that unless the bills were paid within thirty days from July 1, 1908, he would take legal proceedings to enforce the collection of the taxes. The appellants, contending that their property under the Act of 1888, Chapter 98, known as the Annexation Act,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sindall v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  2. Valentine v. Mayor of HagerstownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. GailCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  5. Hiss v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gimbel v. GimbelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Jacobs v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Farmers' Milling & Grain Co. v. UrnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  4. Board of Commissioners v. Lattas Creek Coal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Mayor of Havre De Grace v. Havre De Grace & Perryville Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API