Legal Opinion
S & H Packing & Sales Co. v. Tanimura Distributing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 27, 2017No. 14-56059, No. 14-56078PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by Judge MELLOY
*449OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants are produce growers (“Growers”) who sold their perishable agricultural products on credit to a distributor, Tani-mura Distributing, Inc. (“Tanimura”). Pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 499a-499t, this arrangement made Tanimura a trustee over a PACA trust holding the perishable products and any resulting proceeds for the Growers as PACA-trust beneficiaries. Tanimura then sold the products on credit to third parties and transferred its own resulting accounts receivable to Appellee Agricap Financial…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Reaves Brokerage Co. v. Sunbelt Fruit & Vegetable Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Gordon Howard Lucas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Nickey Gregory Co., LLC v. AGRICAP, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Endico Potatoes, Inc. v. Cit Group/Factoring, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- State of Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- S & H Packing & Sales Co. v. Tanimura Distributing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Rafael Diaz-Rodriguez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Ronald Lamont Seldon, A/K/A Pee WeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Amerson v. American National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- G.W. Palmer & Co. v. Agricap Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018