Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1989No. 55897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was convicted, after a jury trial, of stealing over $150, § 537.030, RSMo 1978, and sentenced as a persistent offender to a term of twelve years’ imprisonment. Movant’s conviction and sentence were affirmed by this court on appeal. See State v. Donaldson, 745 S.W.2d 217 (Mo.App.1987).

Movant asserts his Rule 29.15 motion was erroneously denied on two grounds. Movant first asserts his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate the State’s evidence against movant.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Hanson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Rainbolt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Butler v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API