State v. Gerbert
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Presiding Judge.
We consolidated these appeals to consider the trial court’s grant of defendants’ motions for discharge and acquittal pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-170.
1. The State first argues that the court should have denied the motions for discharge because the demands for speedy trial were filed before the formal accusations were filed. The State contends that the *721uniform traffic citations (UTC) against each defendant could not serve as accusations and that even if they could, they were not filed prior to the demands.
Case No. A95A1021
On June 7, 1994, a citation was issued charging Gerbert…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Majia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Ellerbee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- State v. RustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- State v. LipskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GerbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Shire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Druitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- State v. GerbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997