Anderson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
We affirm Anderson’s conviction and sentence for grand theft. The trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in limiting voir dire.
Prior to the commencement of voir dire, the trial court informed the attorneys that jury selection would be limited to thirty minutes per side. There were no objections raised at this time. The court then asked background questions of each prospective juror, including where they reside, their employment status, marital status, and the employment of their spouse and children. The court also posed general questions to the entire panel, such as whether they or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'HARA v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- HERMANE THOMANY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- DEMETRIUS JEFFREY HOPKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- DONALD LEE CASSADAY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020