McClanahan v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Per curiam
Petitioner appeals from the post-conviction court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, making several arguments in his appellate brief. We reject those arguments without discussion. Petitioner also has filed a supplemental brief in which he asserts that the stipulated departure sentence on his conviction for first-degree manslaughter is unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000).
We reject petitioner’s argument because the principles announced by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Page v. PalmateerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Makinson v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McClanahan v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005