Legal Opinion

Wambold v. Wambold

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 15, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDMAN, Justice.

Matthew Wambold (Matthew) appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) affirming the judgment of the District Court (Caribou, Gaulin, J.) denying his motions to alter and for relief from a divorce judgment. Matthew’s central claim on appeal is that (1) the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act 1 (the UCCJA) and the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act 2 (the PKPA) deprived the District Court of jurisdiction of the child custody issues, and (2) that pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 80(d) as it existed in 1990, his appearance, entered before the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Atkins v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Spaulding v. SpauldingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Hepner v. HepnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Jones v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of N.M.B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. In Re Amberley D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Barclay v. EckertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  4. Town of Poland v. T & M Mortgage Solutions, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. Guardianship of Gabriel W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API