Legal Opinion

Brettelle v. Life Insurance Co. of North America

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 8, 2010No. Case 09cv534 JM(WMc)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT; DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

JEFFREY T. MILLER, District Judge.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52, Plaintiff Silena Brettelle moves for entry of judgment on her ERISA claim for plan benefits. Defendants Life Insurance Company of North America (“LINA”) and Science Applications International Employee Welfare Benefit Plan (the “Plan”) oppose the motion and cross-move for judgment in their favor on the ground that “no accident” occurred and therefore there is no liability under the accidental death policy. For the reasons set forth below, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Alane King, as Conservator and Natural Parent of Amber Lynn Schanus v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Jorita Padfield v. Aig Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Ioane John Opeta v. Northwest Airlines Pension Plan for Contract EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Santos v. Minnesota Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  2. Wolf v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API