Legal Opinion

ARELLANO v. DAVIS

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 1, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01001Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : LUIS JOSE ARELLANO, : Civil Action No. 19-1001 (JMV) : Petitioner, : : v. : MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER : BRUCE DAVIS, et al., : : Respondents. : : 1. Presently before the Court is pro se Petitioner Jose Luis Arellano’s (Petitioner) second motion to stay this habeas matter.1 (DE 14). For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s motion is denied. 2. On or about January 22, 2019, Petitioner filed his pertinent habeas pleading seeking relief pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(the “Petition”). (DE 1). The Petition sets forth three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Crews v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  4. State v. G.E.P.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  5. State v. CrosbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API