Legal Opinion

Industrial Nucleonics Corp. v. Hinde

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 5, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8858PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, abstracted at 166 U.S.P. Q. 160 (1970), dismissing appellant’s opposition to the registration by appellee of ACCURA-FLO, application serial No. 242,820, filed April 6, 1966, claiming first use March 9,1966. We affirm.

The goods for which appellee seeks to register the mark are “a metering flume used for the measurement of sewage and industrial waste and allied solutions.” The record shows that the flumes sold by appellee under the mark are of two kinds, the Palmer Bowlus flume and the Parshall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Industrial Nucleonics Corporation v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Toys "R" US, Inc. v. Canarsie Kiddie Shop, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1983
  2. American Television and Communications Corporation v. American Communications and Television, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Dan Robbins & Associates v. Questor Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  4. Interstate Brands Corp. v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  5. In Re ST. HELENA HOSPITALCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API