Grant v. Bannister
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This action is brought to quiet plaintiff’s title to, and have it adjudged that he is the owner of, two hundred and fifty shares of the capital stock of defendant corporation. All the defendants except Hearfield and the corporation are directors of defendant corporation.
Defendants at the time of pleading moved for an order changing the place of trial from the' county of Marin, where the action was commenced, to the county of Tuolumne, upon the grounds,—1. That the county of Marin is not the proper place for the trial of the said action, for the reason that the residence of each of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hanchett v. FinchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- San Jose Hospital v. EthertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Finnell v. FinnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Irwin v. TaubmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.