Oak Grove Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. City of Hattiesburg
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Presiding Justice,
for the court:
This case is before us on two separate appeals from the decree of the Forrest County Chancery Court denying in part and affirming in part an ordinance of the City of Hattiesburg seeking to extend and enlarge its municipal corporate limits. The City appeals the chancellor’s decision to deny the city’s annexation of certain Lamar County lands. The Oak Grove Concerned Citizens Association and the Shadow Wood/Richburg Concerned Citizens Association appeal the chancellor’s decision to allow the annexation of certain Lamar County lands. We affirm.
FACTS
On…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hans v. HansMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- Bassett v. Town of TaylorsvilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Enlargement of Yazoo City v. Yazoo CityMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Dodd v. CITY OF JACKSON, MISSMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
- Matter of Boundaries of City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Boundaries of City of HattiesburgMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Enlargement of Corp. LimitsMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Enlargement and Ext. of Municipal Boundaries of City of D'IbervilleMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Taylor v. Progressive SEC. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Griffin v. ManningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.