Legal Opinion
Wensley v. Randolph
New York Court of Common Pleas
Decided August 1, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from second district court. Action by George W. Wensley against Wilton Randolph. From an order granting a motion to open a default, plaintiff appeals. Appeal dismissed.
1Per curiam
The power of this court to entertain appeals from district courts is purely statutory. No authority for entertaining an appeal from an interlocutory order has been brought to our attention. Our jurisdiction is limited to appeals from judgments, and final orders in summary proceedings. See Jacobs v. Zeltner (handed down herewith) 30 N. Y. Supp. 238. This appeal must therefore be dismissed, with costs to respondent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jacobs v. ZeltnerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pascocello v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Feist v. Third Ave. RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Zimmermann v. BlochNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Nicholson v. MoriartyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895