Legal Opinion

State v. Resendiz-Fortanel

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1998No. 23387PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a charge for driving without privileges. We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Federico Resendiz-Fortanel was convicted of driving under the influence and driving without privileges in July of 1994. As a result, his driving privileges were suspended from July 21, 1994, until January 17, 1996. When the period of his suspension expired, Resendiz failed to file for reinstatement. 1 Subsequently, on June 21, 1996, Resendiz was stopped by a police officer for running a stop sign.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BrowningIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hanks v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. ParfittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Frink v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. MalandIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beehler v. Fremont CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API