Carter v. General Motors Corp.

{dissenting). Justice Souris affirms the workmen’s compensation appeal board under part 2 of the act,* and states: “Such conclusion renders unnecessary any discussion of the applicability of part 7 to the facts of this case.”

*595' James H. McLaughlin, chairman of the workmen’s compensation appeal board, found that defendant’s foreman was “riding” and “wrangling” with plaintiff, and that plaintiff was entitled to receive compensation under part 7 of the act, stating:

“Plaintiff sustained a personal injury arising out of and in the course of employment and due to causes and conditions characteristic…