Legal Opinion

Jones v. District Court Ex Rel. Second Judicial District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 2, 1989No. 89SA94PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This is an original proceeding seeking relief in the nature of mandamus or prohibition under C.A.R. 21. The petitioner, Stephen C. Jones, is charged with second-degree burglary in a criminal case pending in the respondent district court (district court). Before trial, petitioner filed a motion seeking to have the respondent trial judge (respondent): (1) direct the court reporter to record all trial proceedings, and, in particular, all bench conferences; and (2) permit the parties to make a contemporaneous record of objections and the grounds for the objections. Respondent granted the motion…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HammonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  2. Sanchez v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Herren v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Keady v. Owers as Judge of Fifth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. People v. NullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  3. People v. VialpandoColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Halliburton v. Public Service Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API