Legal Opinion

Cook v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 22, 1958No. 3-57-35 to 3-57-37PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

These three cases, consolidated for trial, were brought by plaintiffs to recover a refund of federal income taxes. Defendant admits payment of the taxes and seasonable claim for refund in each case.

Most of the facts are undisputed and a general statement thereof will be made as applicable in each case.

Clement F. Cook and Wilfred L. Cook, during all times material herein, were partners in the business of operating a mink ranch at St. Peter, Minnesota. Patricia Cook’s interest is by reason of her having filed a joint return with her husband, Wilfred L. Cook, for one of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bennett (Two Cases). Finch v. Arnold, Acting Collector of Internal Revenue (Two Cases). Birkbeck v. Thomas. Ritchie v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Albright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  3. Kahua Ranch, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
  4. Retz v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  2. Herbert A. Nieman & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  3. Cedarburg Fox Farms, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1959
  4. Cedarburg Fox Farms, Inc. v. United States of America, Cedarburg Fox Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API