Cook v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
These three cases, consolidated for trial, were brought by plaintiffs to recover a refund of federal income taxes. Defendant admits payment of the taxes and seasonable claim for refund in each case.
Most of the facts are undisputed and a general statement thereof will be made as applicable in each case.
Clement F. Cook and Wilfred L. Cook, during all times material herein, were partners in the business of operating a mink ranch at St. Peter, Minnesota. Patricia Cook’s interest is by reason of her having filed a joint return with her husband, Wilfred L. Cook, for one of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Bennett (Two Cases). Finch v. Arnold, Acting Collector of Internal Revenue (Two Cases). Birkbeck v. Thomas. Ritchie v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Albright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Kahua Ranch, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
- Retz v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Edwards v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
- Herbert A. Nieman & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
- Cedarburg Fox Farms, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1959
- Cedarburg Fox Farms, Inc. v. United States of America, Cedarburg Fox Farms, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.