Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Houdry Process Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 14616PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

A concern called Process Engineers had a contract to build an oil cracking unit in Oklahoma. The contractor was unable to finish the job and the plaintiff, which had furnished the completion bond, took over and finished it at a loss. In this action the plaintiff is suing the defendant, the manufacturer of the unit, for damages, charging that the defendant was responsible for the failure, and assigning several grounds — participation in the project, breach of warranty and negligence.

The plaintiff has noticed its intention to take the depositions of four witnesses, two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gibson v. International Freighting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CARBINE CONST. CO., INC. v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API