Legal Opinion

Coburn v. Continental Casualty Co.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided June 5, 2003No. 1:03-cr-00075Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

COSBEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on Continental Casualty’s April 3, 2003 “Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Request for Jury Trial” and Floyd Coburn’s (“Coburn”) “Request for Jury Trial,” filed on March 18, 2003, each concerning Coburn’s claim for long-term disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. For the reasons provided below, the motion to strike Coburn’s request for a jury will be granted.

I. THE FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On February 5, 2003,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Daniel v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Hebra A. Berry v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API