Legal Opinion

Hamlin v. Hamlin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1910No. 8550PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered October 19, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court, in an ■action in equity.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action was commenced by Edward H. Hamlin against James W. Hamlin, Mrs. S. A. Hanna, Prank R. Atkins, and Mary C. Atkins, his wife, to establish a trust and recover plaintiff’s interest therein. In 1876 William H. Hamlin and Marie Hamlin, both now deceased, were intermarried in this state. William H. Hamlin had, by a former marriage, one son, the defendant James W. Hamlin, and Marie Hamlin had, by a former marriage, one son, the plaintiff, who adopted the name of Hamlin. William H. and Marie Hamlin acquired considerable land in Snohomish county as their community property. On July 13,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Devol v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Varley v. SimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Podhajsky v. BednarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Rennie v. Washington Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API