Legal Opinion

Munoz v. New York Telephone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

*657The plaintiff Fausto Munoz was injured while removing asbestos for his employer, Detail, on property owned by New York Telephone, the defendant third-party plaintiff. Fausto Munoz and Cecilia Munoz, his wife, commenced a negligence action against New York Telephone. New York Telephone then commenced this third-party action for indemnification against the appellant Gregory Studencki d/b/a Detail.

After failing to effectuate service upon Gregory Studencki, a resident of Poland, New York Telephone moved pursuant to CPLR 308 (5) to allow expedient service upon the State Insurance Fund, which had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Giannizzero v. HerzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. P.E.A. Films, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API