Legal Opinion

Wagoner v. Bainbridge State Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1933No. Nos. 9410, 9411PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. Though, in sharp conflict, there was sufficient evidence to support the finding by the jury, approved by the trial judge, that the bank had not executed a release to the lot in question.

2. None of the grounds of the motion for a new trial show error.

3. The prayers of the petition, construed together with its allegations, are sufficient to authorize the court to render a judgment which will do equity to all parties. Sheftall v. Johnson, 170 Ga. 578 (153 S. E. 354). The judgment on the main bill of exceptions will be affirmed, with direction that on the filing of the remittitur in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheftall v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John H. Kent, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy of C. M. Jones & Company v. Walter E. Heller & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. John H. Kent, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy of C. M. Jones & Company v. Walter E. Heller & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API