Legal Opinion

Yetner v. Corkery Genealogical, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 27, 1998No. 96-542-AppealPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This case came before a three judge panel of the Supreme Court for oral argument pursuant to an order directing both parties to appear and to show cause why the issue raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda of the parties we conclude that cause has not been shown. Therefore, we will decide this case summarily at this time.

The appellee, Corkery Genealogical, Inc., filed a miscellaneous petition in the Probate Court for the City of Warwick seeking to reopen the estate of Frank A. Yetner and for permission to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steinhof v. KeeferSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
  2. Waz v. Estate of JudgeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Tatro v. DooleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of SpeightSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  2. Joyce Duffy v. Estate of Bartolomie ScireSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  3. In Re Estate of Oliveira.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  4. Joyce Duffy v. Estate of Bartolomie ScireSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
  5. Kelley v. Jepson, 00-2196 (2001)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API