Legal Opinion

Aston v. Nolan

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1883PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.

Plaintiff alleges in her complaint that on *271a certain day she was the owner and in possession of certain “tenements and buildings” upon a lot of land described, and owner of an unexpired lease-hold interest in the lot; that defendant was the owner in fee and in possession of an adjoining lot (describing it); that the plaintiff’s land “and tenements ” had the lateral and adjacent support from defendant’s land, and plaintiff was entitled to have such support;, that defendant commenced to excavate her lot adjacent to plaintiff’s “land and buildings,” for the purpose of construction, “and took…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Boswell v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Lawrence v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Walker v. StrosniderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Holtz v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Corcoran v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Neyman v. PincusMontana Supreme Court · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API