Aston v. Nolan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
Plaintiff alleges in her complaint that on *271a certain day she was the owner and in possession of certain “tenements and buildings” upon a lot of land described, and owner of an unexpired lease-hold interest in the lot; that defendant was the owner in fee and in possession of an adjoining lot (describing it); that the plaintiff’s land “and tenements ” had the lateral and adjacent support from defendant’s land, and plaintiff was entitled to have such support;, that defendant commenced to excavate her lot adjacent to plaintiff’s “land and buildings,” for the purpose of construction, “and took…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Boswell v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Lawrence v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Rubbish Collectors Ass'n v. SiliznoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Walker v. StrosniderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Holtz v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Corcoran v. S. S. Kresge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Neyman v. PincusMontana Supreme Court · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.