Thomas v. Marmar

WILLSON, O. J.

(after stating the ease as above).

In the statement above it appears that both appellants Thomas and the Widemans . and appellee Marmar claimed to own the title in W. A. Dyer January 30, 1923, to the minerals in controversy' — appellants under a deed to them of that date from Dyer, and appel-lee under a deed to him dated January 13, 1926, from the sheriff of Henderson county. A part of the consideration for said deed to appellants was eight promissory notes, for $120 each, made by appellants to said Dyer, payment of which was secured by a vendor’s lien therein and in his said…