Spearing v. Silverman
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtCondon, C. J.
This is an action of assumpsit which was tried to a jury in the superior court and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. Thereafter the defendant filed a motion for a new trial which was denied by the trial justice. The case is here on the defendant’s bill of exceptions con7 taining that exception and twenty-nine others to rulings during the trial.
Upon our examination of the record we find that G. L. 1956, §9-24-20, governing the allowance of a bill of exceptions has not been complied with by defendant. Under that section the exceptions and transcript must be submitted to the trial justice…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Potter v. ChettleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
- State v. RaposaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- Warwick Municipal Employees Credit Union v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
- Maioli v. RoderickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
- State v. FortesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.