Legal Opinion

State v. Ford

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 1, 2010No. 3D09-1659PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.

The defendant was charged with burglary and possession of burglary tools, and according to the sentencing guidelines, the lowest permissible sentence he could receive upon a conviction was 48.6 months. Although the State was seeking an enhanced penalty pursuant to the habitual offender statute, the trial court departed downward and sentenced the defendant to three years of probation with special conditions. The State appeals the defendant’s downward departure sentence. Because there is insufficient competent evidence to support the trial court’s ruling, we reverse.

In State v. Salgado, 948…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SalgadoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. State v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. State v. ScherberDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. State v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. State v. PorcheDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State of Florida v. Harry James ChubbuckSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  2. Barnhill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. State v. ChubbuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. State v. OwensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. State v. MassingillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API