Legal Opinion

State v. Pittel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1994No. C4-93-1359PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

As a result of the court of appeals’ unpublished decision in this case, which granted defendant Melvin Pittel relief from some of his multiple convictions, State v. Pittel, 1994 WL 146211 (Minn.App., filed Apr. 26, 1994), defendant stands convicted of six counts of theft and faces concurrent sentences of .15, 18, 21, 19, 82 and 82 months in prison. The 82-month term is the result of a double durational departure from the presumptive sentence of 41 months for the original eighth count. We hold that the trial court had no basis for doubling the 41-month sentence but…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. KirschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. State v. PittelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API