Hulet v. Payne
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error*, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought an action against the defendant in error, hereinafter called defendant, alleging injuries as the result of the defendant’s negligence. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court directed a verdict against him. In this proceeding he alleges that that direction was erroneous.
The pleadings and proofs show that the plaintiff was accompanying the shipment of a carload of cattle to market over the line of the Northern Pacific Railway Company from a town in North Dakota to St. Paul, Minn. He took passage on the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Norfolk Southern Railroad v. ChatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Distler v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Oaks v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- El Dorado Refining Co. v. LientzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925