Legal Opinion

Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Halsey

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1968No. Docket Nos. 3,515, 3,516, 3,517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal is taken by defendant Halsey from the denial by the trial court, sitting without a jury, of defendant’s motion to dismiss, made at the close of plaintiffs’ proofs (G-CR 1963, 514.2), and from a finding that defendant’s car was being driven with his consent when it illegally entered an intersection, and collided with a bus which in turn struck two parked cars insured by plaintiff, Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange.

An automobile owner, to be held responsible under the civil liability act, CLS 1961, § 257.401 (Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 9.2101) must consent to or know of another’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hatter v. Dodge Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Monaghan v. PavsnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Baumgartner v. HamMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Houseman v. Walt Neal, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ensign v. CraterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API